The defendant may admit all or part of a lawsuit. The parties may reach an amicable agreement. An example of an appeal to the Court of Arbitration Seventeenth through the Arbitration Court of Appeal Arbitration Court of Perm region, Perm, ul. Lunacharsky, 3 Plaintiff: Agricultural Production Cooperative "Sunrise" 617 080 Perm, Berezniki, st. Quay, 8 Defendant: The Russian Federation represented by Federal Tax Service of Russia, Moscow, st. Neglinnaya, 23 co-defendant: Interregional tax inspectorate of Russia 2 in the Perm region 618 400, Perm, Berezniki, st. Karl Marx, 46 case number A50-9880/2010 Appeals against the decision of the Arbitration Court of Perm region of 23.08.2010g. Interdistrict Inspectorate of the Federal Tax Service number 2 in the Perm Region (hereinafter – Inspection) in accordance with article 257 of the Arbitration Code of the Russian Federation (hereinafter – the APC), requests that the appeal in the present case.
The decision of the Inspectorate 40 of 21.12.2010g. Agricultural Production Cooperative "Sunrise" (hereinafter – the plaintiff) was involved in tax liability. A decision of the Federal Tax Service in the Perm region (Russia further UFNS the Perm Region) from 24.03.2010g. 18-23/101 Inspectorate decision 40 of 21.12.2009g. changed by removing a part of the accrual UTII for 2nd – 4th quarters of 2006, penalties for failure to pay UTII, a fine under paragraph 2 of Article 119 of the Tax Code for failure to tax declaration UTII for the 4th quarter of 2006, the penalty under paragraph 1 of Article 122 of the Tax Code, and penalties for failure to pay VAT for 3, 4th quarters of 2007, as well as applications tax penalties without reducing them twice under Articles 112 and 114 of the Tax Code and to cease production in the case of tax violation in these parts.