The homofobia is palco of great debates contemporaries and the domesticao of the body is pertinent subject to the debate, since to contain the nature of the instincts it would be a form to domesticate it. To face its proper nature would be the negation of its identity and acceptance of one ' ' conscience moral' ' before the individual one. The social and civil rights of the homosexuals in some societies already are accepted and duly are regulated, while in other societies, as in Brazil, its rights are not accepted. ' ' conscience moral' ' , that is, the society does not recognize its rights and the homosexuals they are victims of discrimination and preconception. In addition they are excluded socially from this society. In the last few decades a significant change comes occurring and some rights are recognized and the respect to the diversity and the sexual freedom had passed to be valued. To relativize starts to be the great challenge.
Especially between homosexuals masculine, perceive, that the desire to contain the nature of the bodies and the impulses remains present until a stage of its lives, that goes since infancy to youth, moment this where the individual represents the society in its totality. With the ascension of the individual conscience and the reason the homosexuals search its emancipation and the sexual experimentation, as well as fighting for its individual and collective rights, as the important movement of combat the homofobia. Victims of violence, persecution, murders and others this debate of the homossexualismo is active in the great universities and social institutions of Brazil and other communities, in intention to recognize its rights to life, freedom and physical and moral integrity. Quarrels and Conclusions the considered subject contextualiza in a quarrel contemporary as the question of the homossexualismo. It matters to recognize our proper nature and to understand that ' ' desire that we have to domesticate ours corpo' ' it is consequence of an education socially constructed, that is, a social fact. The individual in elapsing of the history of the humanity passed for some transformations and at some moments the body, its desires, impulses and the diverse forms of relations had been resignificadas. Notadamente culture one is precipitated of experiences and ephemeral one. To share a culture is to be solidary in the same etnocntrica and present vision if it makes important reflection, it has since those that share our vision of world are civilized and those that if they distanciam are barbarous.
The fact of ' is acceptable; ' each another one to find the other bizarro' ' , Barbarian, but ' ' we are equally the other, we are only made familiar by ours proper costume' '. ' ' Identity is a process relacional' ' ' ' We prefer to launch outside of the culture, in the nature, everything what one is not satisfied with our norm under which if vive' ' (Lvi Strauss) References 1.SENNETT, Richard; Meat and Rock. Rio De Janeiro: Record publishing company, 1994. 2.FOUCALT, Michel; History of the Sexuality? The Care of Itself. Ed. Graal. Gratefulness: I thank to the Teacher and Person who orientates Mirela Berger for the support and patience and for the dynamics of its teachings that accessible to our ears still little accustomed to the sociological subject and you analyze them allowed me the production of this unpretentious assay, and to all our Masters of the Graduation of Sciences Partners of the UFES that had contributed direct or indirectly for our formation.